Skip to content
Droid/Security deployment evidence

A deployment is evidence.
Of what, exactly?

Compare security robot pilots and reported operations by robot, operating mode, evidence date and cost scope. Inspect Caltrans, NYPD and stadium records and export the sources.

Separate the machine, the operator and the outcome.

These records describe particular sites and periods. Completed pilot, reported operation and operating mode are separate fields. A research report may evaluate a remotely driven system; a current product page may advertise automatic routes. Neither should silently replace the other.

This initial set is not a market-wide ranking or a list of Droid installations. Downloading retains dates, conditions, unknowns and primary sources.

3 of 3 reviewed records shown

Completed pilotRemotely piloted

Caltrans Shop 8 · San Bernardino

March 8–September 8, 2024

Asylon DroneDog ↗ · 2024 pilot system; exact hardware / software release unspecified

Task and operating evidence
Equipment-yard patrol using two DroneDogs. UC Davis AHMCT reports human RSOC operators piloted each patrol. This study does not validate the autonomy of today’s offering.
Limits of the record
The report identifies weather pauses and missed patrols. Table 4.1 excludes April, boundary periods and maintenance downtime; its averages are not whole-contract uptime.
Reported outcome
No theft or damage incidents were reported during the pilot. Without a comparable control, that observation does not establish a causal reduction.
Price evidence
About $142,000 USD · 2 robots · 6 months · 112 scheduled hours/week · 2024 pilot, San Bernardino, California, US. Approximate total pilot deployment cost. Current quotes, detailed inclusions and longer-term rates may differ.
Droid’s procurement implication

Require two denominators: service hours purchased and useful route coverage delivered. Preserve all downtime in the acceptance log.

  • Actual patrol time across all scheduled hours, including excluded periods
  • Current delivered autonomy and the cost of retained human response

Evidence type: commissioned field study · Source date: 2025-05-20 · Reviewed 2026-11-10

Completed pilotAutonomous route with escort

NYPD · Times Square subway station

September 22, 2023–February 2024

Knightscope K5 ↗ · K5 used in 2023–24; exact revision not established

Task and operating evidence
A predefined station route during midnight–6 a.m. hours. NYC’s inspector general describes the concluded pilot and a deployment plan with TARU personnel supervising. The launch called for an accompanying officer.
Limits of the record
This is a historical pilot record. The report does not establish the current status of the unit or performance of the K5V5 brochure configuration.
Reported outcome
The inspector general reported that requested outcome records had not been supplied at publication. Effectiveness remains unestablished in this source.
Price evidence
No current configured price established in this record.
Droid’s procurement implication

An escorted trial does not demonstrate removal of a staffed post. Measure retained labor rather than assuming it disappears.

  • Pilot outcome records and actual staff time
  • Any later redeployment and its exact configuration

Evidence type: public agency oversight · Source date: 2024-05-30 · Reviewed 2026-11-10

Reported operationsMode not established

Mercedes-Benz Stadium · BENZIE

Supplier interview dated September 2025; customer page reviewed November 2026

Asylon DroneDog ↗ · BENZIE / DroneDog deployment; exact release unspecified

Task and operating evidence
After-hours mobile video patrols, reported by the stadium itself. The stadium identifies BENZIE in its security operation. Asylon’s interview links the deployment to its platform; its case study describes remote alert review.
Limits of the record
The reviewed customer page does not quantify autonomy, patrol availability, staffing hours or operating duration. Separate reports are not continuous telemetry.
Reported outcome
Asylon’s case study claims 2,000+ patrols, zero theft/vandalism in the monitored zone and 30% cost savings. The page does not provide a dated observation window, cost denominator or counterfactual; these are supplier claims, not audited effects.
Price evidence
No current configured price established in this record.
Droid’s procurement implication

A named customer establishes more than a demonstration. It still does not establish your site’s economics or an independently measured service level.

  • What exact cost base and observation period produced the claimed savings?
  • What share of patrol execution requires remote driving?

Evidence type: customer and supplier reports · Source date: Mixed dated and undated sources · Reviewed 2026-11-10

Make the next pilot easier to evaluate.

Keep the complete time denominator.

Log every scheduled minute as useful patrol, charging, weather hold, maintenance, blocked route or another explicit state. Report the longest checkpoint revisit gap as well as the average. Two robots moving together do not necessarily cover twice the required route.

Measure retained human work.

Separate remote driving, mission dispatch, alert review, on-site response and repairs. Record which hours change an actual budget. More information for an existing team can be valuable without implying a removed guard position.

These are Droid’s proposed measurement rules. They are not a claim that every reviewed vendor already reports these metrics.

START WITH THE WORKFLOW

Bring us the task.
Let’s find the fit.

Share your environment, the job to be done, and the outcome you need to measure.

Request a project review